"Lab mice?!"

The title of the last entry ("Haven't seen you since the lube job") is from another Whose Line skit. Ryan and Colin were doing this "Film Noir" scene where the two of them interact with each other and every so often do an inner-monolog narrative to the camera (yes I know there's a word for that which looks something like "serrilaquee" but I can't find the spelling so gimme a break). One of them in one of these monolog narratives says something about having not seen the other since the lube job with his wife but that he wasn't going to mention this but when he goes back to the regular skit immediately says "I haven't seen you since the lube job" to which the other responds "hey!". That show's a little cerebral though (despite the dumbing-down from the British version) and it may be a bit over my head (or maybe I only want it to be). Either way I thought it was a funny line.

Hey look everybody. I've had one hit everyday for five days now. It's like I'm on a roll or something. If you happen to follow the check mark-looking icon at the left you'll note it will lead you to my hits and visitor statistics page which has more than 5 hits a day reflected. Well all "winfirst" and "PacBell usa" identifications would be the author loading the page over and over trying to get it to look right. But the other hits are actual visitors. So that'd come out to 5 in the last 5 days now. In a row! So to all the other blog authors who have less than a hit a day I'd just say "hah-hah". Oh and I'm not nearly this narcissistic or egocentric in real life. Just in blog-life. Oh and I'm excited about all the hits.

I would like to complain about the "environmentalist wackos" as the popular term goes. Or perhaps the more accurate term is "environmentalist nazis" or "them crazy motherfuckers who don't have a shower or know what the fuck they're talking about".

Did I scare away what few visitors I have? Great. Perhaps I should clarify my definitions here. The "environmentalists" of which I am referring to aren't really environmentalists but really members of some sort of weird cult bent on imposing socialism on the world. Pretending to love flowers and a pathetic attempt at science just happened to be the chose medium for this goal. So if you or someone you know buys a Sierra Club calendar every year and writes a check to "save the rain forest" to better sleep at night: don't worry. You're not one of these nazis of which I speak. You'll recognize them when you see them.

For example if you were to read this story (new window) you would see these elitist who supposedly know something of the environment (e.g. write checks and say the right shit at the right time) actually don't want to be bothered with it when it might have a negative effect on one of them personally.

Separately and unrelated to Kerry there are also organizations actively pursuing a policy of a "voluntary human extinction" in order to save the earth. These would be the nazis of which I referred to earlier. The cultists are a little different however. They have little groups of people around world whose sole job it is to indoctrinate what I can only assume to be very very susceptible young people from grade school to apparently upper 20's in age. I assume it goes something like trying to wrap ideas and concepts into logical and smart-sounding wrappers, which seamlessly blends over into Bush-the-savage-caveman-who-bombs-the-innocent. I would expect your average person would be able to recognize this effectively but apparently I am wrong. So what we get are semi-brainwashed seemingly mindless automatons who don't seem to be able to say anything besides something to the effect of "the earth is dieing" and "Bush is evil" in one way or another.

Now I hate to mention Al Gore as those two word are for some reason a very polarizing phrase. But might I point out he wasn't always so great in them minds of ... however many people are left who actually follow him like a cult guru of some sort. In fact when he was a senator from Tennessee (his home state, had he won he would be president right now. Thank god for pissed-off teneseeians...but that's another entry for another night.) he was actually close "conservative" so far as his pro-tobacco stance and pro-life views. You may be doubting the validity of such a statement (as well you should) but I don't have a link handy to prove so you're going to have to look it up on your own. Some how he became some sort of "environmentalist" psychopath and wrote a book entitled "Earth in the Balance". Apparently the second half of this book is not unlike the Unabomber’s Manifesto, and a copy Gore's book was found in the Unabomber’s shack. But I can't verify either of those statements either. So you may as well dismiss me as some sort of right-wing dumb guy. Or look it up yourself. Now I'm the one making the statements so the burden should be on me to back up what I say. But this is only a blog and I'm too tired. So if this in anyway intrigues you then search for and get back to me.

Another thing on Gore are his mannerisms and apparent worship of the teacher unions and various environmental groups who have bought and paid for him. Just seems so obvious that everything he says and does even now is in direct aim and a particular audience. But this is starting to and will soon be even more so extremely funny and entertaining. And isn't free entertainment something we all want?

Apparently he contemplating almost thinking about maybe becoming interested in a radio and/or cable network that he may or may not partially back in the near or distant future. As reported by Time Online this would be a liberal network in the vein of countering the likes of the Fox News Network and the well known Rush Limbaugh on AM radio. Apparently two (or two and a half depending on who you ask) cable news networks, ABC/NBC/CBS/PBS and NPR/PRI not to mention the programming of all the other popular cable channels aren't enough for Al Gore and the rest of them. They want a wide "diverse" range of opinions -- as long as those opinions are theirs I gather. Take a look people. MSNBC is the most liberal thing you could ever ask for. PBS? Lots of right wing perspective there. And NPR? It's even better than the rest not even having to turn a profit thanks to the public funding. Nobody listening or contributing? Just allocate more government money. So how can any of you non-conservative types be complaining? Don't like Fox News? Here's an idea: don't watch it. Don't like Limbaugh? Don't listen. I see now what conservatives have been saying for so long is really true. They do want to squelch anything that doesn't agree with them. Makes it much easier to continue saying "we've got wide, diverse array of opinion" when no one is able to speak up and disagree.

By the way and for the record Fox News isn't really that conservative when you come down to it. It simply does a better job of airing both sides of a particular issue or story. CNN and MSNBC do not do this at all. If I watch MSNBC for example within the first few seconds of a reported story I can see a political agenda start to emerge. And how anybody can miss this I don't really know. Now I'm tempted to spend to the next several minutes trying to come up with something specific for an example but that is not necessary as all a reader has to do is turn on MSNBC and watch for a few minutes. Odds are you've never seen it since the ratings range for below 100,000 viewers to perhaps 200,000 (still very low even for cable). And also for the record MSNBC is nothing more than a mouthpiece for every possible liberal agenda you can imagine extremely thinly veiled as a "news source" (again see channel for immediate and obvious example).

I've just realized this was a completely pointless and waste of an entry. Even for a stupid low-read blog entry. So I've decided to stop it here.

  ¶ 12:30 AM